If you want to look further into this topic, check out the
resources available on my Web site at digitalwalk.net.
The world appears to be intelligently designed
On a vacation in Colorado a few years ago, I gazed upon the
brilliant sun as it made its slow, swooping descent toward the purple mountain
skyline. The sunset was drop-dead gorgeous, and in my amazement, I remember
saying to myself, “Who can deny that a God created this?” Later, when my first
child was born, I uttered a similar line as I held my 7-pound, 14-ounce miracle
in my arms. I’m certainly not alone in experiencing these thoughts when
confronted with the wonders of this world. This kind of intuitive belief or “gut
feeling” is enough to convince many that a God who created the earth and its
inhabitants really exists.
This intuition-based claim is similar to the teleological
argument, a theory to prove God’s existence that William Paley originally put
forth back in the 19th century. Paley argued that if you found a
watch when you were on a walk through the woods, you could quickly size up the
object and conclude that such a highly engineered piece of equipment didn’t
just bud on a nearby maple tree. The logical conclusion is that the watch wasn’t
formed by accident, but was designed and constructed by an intelligent being. After
establishing this idea, Paley told his students to back up and look at the
universe – like the watch, its engineering is so complex, precise, and
ingenious that it screams out evidence for a designer.
Although this argument is logical and can be compelling, it
doesn’t convince everyone. An atheist looks at the same sunset or the same
human birth and sees these incidents as nothing more than evolution in action. Ultimately,
the intuitive argument helps confirm suspicions you have toward believing in
God, but doesn’t often change a diehard sceptic’s mind.
However, a second, more compelling argument goes beyond mere
intuition and says that not only does the world appear to be designed, but
correct science cries out that there must be a designer. For example, in his
critically-acclaimed book Darwin’s Black Box (Free Press, 1998), biochemist Michael
Behe argues that evolution can’t sufficiently explain the complexity of
organisms. Darwin insisted that evolution occurred through a series of small
steps that transformed simple structures into complex ones. Yet, the more
scientists discover about the complexity of cells, the more they realize the
practical impossibility of them developing gradually. (See Chapter 16 for more
on Behe’s arguments against Darwinian evolution.)
People (most, anyway) can think and reason
A second argument that Christians hold up as proof that God
exists is what goes on in that noggin of yours and mine. The fact that people
have the ability to think in a logical and rational manner is explainable only
by claiming the existence of God as designer and creator. Okay, I admit, not
all people think rationally, but for the sake of argument, let’s keep the
discussion using you and me as examples... okay, you.
The fact is that people reason – no one can deny that. Therefore,
God either created people with the unique ability to think, or else reason
developed on its own. But believing that people acquired rational thought in
small steps through natural selection reduces people’s ability to reason to
nothing more than a biological process. In his book Mere Christianity (Harper
San Francisco, 2001), C.S. Lewis points out the problem in this line of
thinking by comparing human reason to human eyesight. Your vision is far more
helpful and useful to you than the vision of a single-celled organism that’s
sensitive to light but doesn’t have eyes to see. Now, suppose you give that
cute little creature a set of eyes and throw in a pair of eyeglasses to boot. In
doing so, you would enable the organism to see better, but you wouldn’t bring
it any closer to an intellectual understanding of what light is. Remember, it’s
not scientists with really good eyes who are experts in light. Instead, it’s
the ones who’ve specialized in the related sciences. From this perspective,
trying to fit human reason into an evolutionary process is like trying to watch
a 3-D film without wearing those funny-looking glasses – everything important
is lost in the process.
A faith-filled atheist?
A step of faith isn’t unique to Christianity. Every
religion, theory, or system of belief that attempts to explain the world
requires faith – believing in something that can’t fully be proven. At first
glance, you may think an atheist is exempt from this rule, but that’s not true.
An atheist has faith, all right – not in a divine God, but in the belief that
God doesn’t exist.
No comments:
Post a Comment